Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Enriching trial justice for crime victims in common law systems : lessons from transitional environments.

Doak, J. (2015) 'Enriching trial justice for crime victims in common law systems : lessons from transitional environments.', International review of victimology., 21 (2). pp. 139-160.

Abstract

The role of victims in the criminal trial has been subject to considerable critique in recent years. This article argues that scholarship and policy governing the treatment of victims and witnesses in ‘ordinary’ criminal trials within ‘settled’ societies may be substantially enriched by drawing lessons from the roles of, and practices affecting, victims within post-conflict societies. There is a clear need for policy-makers and law reformers to look beyond the familiar spheres of the domestic criminal process if the justice system is to become more effective, just and legitimate in the eyes of both victims and the wider public. This article draws on both theory and praxis on the role of victims within transitional justice, and contends that trial justice in common law systems may be enriched through centring processes on three key themes which are commonly emphasized in transitional justice frameworks, these being: (i) truth recovery; (ii) victim participation; and (iii) reparation.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Participation, Reparation, Transitional justice, Trials, Victims.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(245Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269758015571469
Publisher statement:Doak, J. (2015) 'Enriching trial justice for crime victims in common law systems : lessons from transitional environments.', International review of victimology., 21 (2). pp. 139-160. Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:20 April 2015
Date of first online publication:09 March 2015
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar