Professor Tiago Moreira tiago.moreira@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Unsettling Standards: the biological age controversy
Moreira, T.
Authors
Abstract
One key debate within the sociology of aging and the life course over the past decade has been focused on understanding the extent to which there has been a shift from a reliance on chronological age to segment the life course and ascertain age-specific norms, values, and expectations toward a destandardized life course in advanced economies. In this, little attention has been devoted to the infrastructural processes that would support such a transition: the technologies, standards, and conventions that would, in practice, equip a personalized, individualized management of the life course. This article focuses on one of such standards, “biological age” (BA), and the 40-year controversy around the method and purpose of its measurement. Drawing on published research and archival and interview data collected in Europe and North America, the article suggests that the persistent uncertainty surrounding BA measurements is structured by differing interlocking relationships between normative ideals of the life course and methodological approaches to knowledge making to understand and manage the relationship among aging, health, and illness. Understanding this controversy and the configuration of normative and epistemic conventions that underpin its dynamic provides a unique lens on the complex interweaving relationship between expertise, scientific and technological standards, and social, normatively embedded age identities in contemporary societies.
Citation
Moreira, T. (2015). Unsettling Standards: the biological age controversy. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12079
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Nov 28, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jan 9, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Sep 22, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 9, 2017 |
Journal | The Sociological Quarterly |
Print ISSN | 0038-0253 |
Electronic ISSN | 1533-8525 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 56 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 18-39 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12079 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(290 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Moreira, T. (2015), Unsettling Standards: The Biological Age Controversy. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(1): 18-39, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12079. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
You might also like
Furthering Ontological Pluralism, Maybe: The Strange Case of the Microbial Recordings
(2023)
Journal Article
Ratifying frailty
(2022)
Journal Article
Infrastructuring experience: what matters in patient-reported outcome data measurement?
(2021)
Journal Article
Translating cell biology of ageing? On the importance of choreographing knowledge
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search