Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The ‘field’ in the age of intervention : power, legitimacy, and authority versus the ‘local’.

Richmond, Oliver and Kappler, Stefanie and Björkdahl, Annika (2015) 'The ‘field’ in the age of intervention : power, legitimacy, and authority versus the ‘local’.', Millennium., 44 (1). pp. 23-44.

Abstract

This article highlights the semantic and socio-political meaning of the ‘field’ as it is used in both academic research and policy practices: as a geographic and material space related to forms of intervention in International Relations (IR), and not as a disciplinary space. We argue that the notion of the ‘field’ carries colonial baggage in terms of denoting ‘backwardness’ and conflictual practices, as well as legitimising the need for intervention by peacebuilding, statebuilding, and development actors located outside the field. We also show how academic practices have tended to create a semiotic frame in which the inhabitants of the research and intervention space are kept at a distance from the researcher, and discursively stripped of their agency. Along similar lines, policy-practice has reinforced the notion of the field as being in need of intervention, making it subject to external control. This article suggests that the agency of the inhabitants of the field has to be re-cognised and de-colonised so that political legitimacy can be recovered from ‘intervention’.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Intervention, Research methodology, Semantics, Agency, Power.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(332Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0305829815594871
Publisher statement:Richmond, Oliver and Kappler, Stefanie and Björkdahl, Annika (2015) 'The ‘field’ in the age of intervention : power, legitimacy, and authority versus the ‘local’.', Millennium., 44 (1). pp. 23-44. Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.
Date accepted:16 June 2015
Date deposited:12 October 2015
Date of first online publication:31 July 2015
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar