Eckersley, P. and Ferry, L. and Zakaria, Z. (2014) 'A ‘panoptical’ or ‘synoptical’ approach to monitoring performance? Local public services in England and the widening accountability gap.', Critical perspectives on accounting., 25 (6). pp. 529-538.
Abstract
This article highlights how recent reforms to the auditing and assessment of local public services in England suggest there will be a shift from panoptical to ‘synoptical’ monitoring approaches. This is because the UK Government has abolished its centralised monitoring regime and instead required local authorities to publish a range of financial and performance datasets online, ostensibly so that citizens can hold organisations to account directly. However, the complexity and raw nature of these data, along with the sidelining of professional auditors, will result in most citizens being either unable or unwilling to undertake this task. As such, the proposed ‘synoptical’ approach will not materialise. Indeed, other legislative changes will mean that outsourcing firms effectively become the new, unaccountable observers of local public sector bodies within an enduring panoptical system. In many cases these companies will then assume responsibility for delivering the same services that they have assessed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Critical, Accountability, Public sector, New public management. |
Full text: | (AM) Accepted Manuscript Download PDF (177Kb) |
Full text: | (VoR) Version of Record Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution. Download PDF (526Kb) |
Status: | Peer-reviewed |
Publisher Web site: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.003 |
Publisher statement: | This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). You may distribute and copy the article, create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, including for commercial purposes without permission from Elsevier. The original work must always be appropriately credited. |
Date accepted: | 06 March 2013 |
Date deposited: | 27 October 2015 |
Date of first online publication: | 21 April 2013 |
Date first made open access: | No date available |
Save or Share this output
Export: | |
Look up in GoogleScholar |