We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

“Nothing truly wild is unclean” : Muir, misanthropy, and the aesthetics of dirt.

James, Simon P. (2014) '“Nothing truly wild is unclean” : Muir, misanthropy, and the aesthetics of dirt.', Environmental ethics., 36 (3). pp. 357-363.


For John Muir, nothing truly wild is unclean. Dirtiness is the result of human influence. Muir’s view finds an echo in the works of those writers, such as Robinson Jeffers, who regard urban environments as wild places that have, over time, become increasingly polluted by human beings and their works. It is clear that such misanthropic views can be criticized on moral grounds; however, they deserve to be criticized on aesthetic grounds, too. To adapt the view of Yuriko Saito, they indicate a failure to appreciate the human world on its own terms.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:10 February 2016
Date of first online publication:September 2014
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar