We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

How does international law condition responses to conflict and negotiation?

O'Donoghue, Aoife (2016) 'How does international law condition responses to conflict and negotiation?', Global policy., 7 (2). pp. 272-277.


This article explores the role law plays in defining conflict and its consequences. Two elements of law's categorisations are critical; first law's cataloguing of activities fixing actions into particular classifications and second law's choosing of temporal points from which to analyse conflict, looking both forward and backward at events. The article uses two case studies to demonstrate these two features; Rwanda and Ukraine. Both examples, one historical the other contemporary, are replete with examples of law's categorisations of events and temporal points while demonstrating the tremendous impact that these choices have upon our understanding of how negotiations ought to proceed. This article does not call for a withdrawal of law from these situations but rather cognisance that heavy reliance on law can serve to mask both events and actors critical to successful negotiation and parties must bare this in mind when dealing with conflict.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is the accepted version of the following article: O'Donoghue, A. (2016), How Does International Law Condition Responses to Conflict and Negotiation?. Global Policy, 7(2): 272-277, which has been published in final form at This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Date accepted:12 February 2016
Date deposited:15 February 2016
Date of first online publication:28 April 2016
Date first made open access:28 April 2018

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar