We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

What attachment to peace? Exploring the normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding.

Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas and Kappler, Stefanie (2016) 'What attachment to peace? Exploring the normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding.', Review of International Studies, 42 (5). pp. 895-914.


The peacebuilding and academic communities are divided over the issue of local ownership between problem-solvers who believe that local ownership can ‘save liberal peacebuilding’ and critical voices claiming that local ownership is purely a rhetorical device to hide the same dynamics of intervention used in more ‘assertive’ interventions. The article challenges these two sets of assumptions to suggest that one has to combine an analysis of the material and normative components of ownership to understand the complex ways in which societies relate to the peace that is being created. Building on the recent scholarship on ‘attachment’, we claim that different modalities of peacebuilding lead to different types of social ‘attachment’ – social-normative and social-material – to the peace being created on the part of its subjects.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:© British International Studies Association 2016. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in 'Review of International Studies' (42: 05 (2016) 895-914)
Date accepted:15 February 2016
Date deposited:23 February 2016
Date of first online publication:29 March 2016
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar