S. Lemmermeyer
Testing the Plant Growth-Defense Hypothesis Belowground: Do Faster-Growing Herbaceous Plant Species Suffer More Negative Effects from Soil Biota than Slower-Growing Ones?
Lemmermeyer, S.; Lörcher, L.; van Kleunen, M.; Dawson, W.
Abstract
According to the growth-defense hypothesis in ecology, faster-growing plant species should suffer more from herbivores and pathogens than slower-growing species. Tests of this hypothesis have focused on aboveground plant tissues, herbivores, and pathogens; however, it should also apply to root defense. To test whether faster-growing species suffer more negatively from soil biota than slower-growing species, we estimated first-season growth rates of 34 herbaceous plant species and used weighted linear regressions to assess the relationship between growth rates and responses to being grown in sterilized versus unsterilized soil (biotic soil effects) and to growing in soil previously occupied by conspecifics versus a mixture of species (conspecific soil effects). We found a negative relationship between relative growth rate and biotic soil effects, with slower-growing species tending to suffer less or even benefit from the presence of soil biota, while faster-growing species were more negatively affected. Biotic soil effects were also negatively related to size-corrected growth rates. These relationships remained negative after accounting for influential species, but a large amount of variation remained unexplained. Moreover, there was no clear relationship between growth rates and conspecific soil effects. A simple relationship between growth and defense aboveground may not be so clearly reflected belowground because of the many interacting antagonistic and mutualistic organisms likely involved.
Citation
Lemmermeyer, S., Lörcher, L., van Kleunen, M., & Dawson, W. (2015). Testing the Plant Growth-Defense Hypothesis Belowground: Do Faster-Growing Herbaceous Plant Species Suffer More Negative Effects from Soil Biota than Slower-Growing Ones?. The American Naturalist, 186(2), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1086/682005
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2015 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 28, 2024 |
Journal | American Naturalist |
Print ISSN | 0003-0147 |
Electronic ISSN | 1537-5323 |
Publisher | The University of Chicago Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 186 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 264-271 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1086/682005 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2015 by The University of Chicago Press.
Published Journal Article
(615 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The poleward naturalization of intracontinental alien plants.
(2023)
Journal Article
The naturalized vascular flora of Malesia
(2023)
Journal Article
Model Selection in Occupancy Models: Inference versus Prediction
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search