Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?

Beyleveld, Deryck and Düwell, Marcus and Spahn, Andreas (2015) 'Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?', Jurisprudence., 6 (3). pp. 549-566.

Abstract

This paper analyses the main challenges (particularly those deriving from the non-identity problem and epistemic uncertainty concerning the preferences of future persons) to the idea that we should and can represent future generations in our present policymaking. It argues that these challenges can and should be approached from the perspective of human rights. To this end it introduces and sketches the main features of a human rights framework derived from the moral theory of Alan Gewirth. It indicates how this framework can be grounded philosophically, sketches the main features and open questions of the framework and its grounding, and shows how it can be used to deal with the challenges to the idea that future generations have rights that can be represented in our policymaking.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(391Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2015.1065642
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Jurisprudence on 01/09/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/20403313.2015.1065642.
Date accepted:27 June 2014
Date deposited:02 March 2016
Date of first online publication:03 November 2015
Date first made open access:01 March 2017

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar