Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Twisted versus braided magnetic flux ropes in coronal geometry. I. Construction and relaxation.

Prior, C. and Yeates, A. (2016) 'Twisted versus braided magnetic flux ropes in coronal geometry. I. Construction and relaxation.', Astronomy & astrophysics., 587 . A125.

Abstract

We introduce a technique for generating tubular magnetic fields with arbitrary axial geometry and internal topology. As an initial application, this technique is used to construct two magnetic flux ropes that have the same sigmoidal tubular shape, but have different internal structures. One is twisted, the other has a more complex braided magnetic field. The flux ropes are embedded above the photospheric neutral line in a quadrupolar linear force-free background. Using resistive-magnetohydrodynamic simulations, we show that both fields can relax to stable force-free equilibria whilst maintaining their tubular structure. Both end states are nonlinear force-free; the twisted field contains a single sign of alpha (the force-free parameter), indicating a twisted flux rope of a single dominant chirality, the braided field contains both signs of alpha, indicating a flux rope whose internal twisting has both positive and negative chirality. The electric current structures in these final states differ significantly between the braided field, which has a diffuse structure, and the twisted field, which displays a clear sigmoid. This difference might be observable.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(10269Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(15458Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527231
Publisher statement:Reproduced with permission from Astronomy & Astrophysics, © ESO
Date accepted:21 November 2015
Date deposited:15 March 2016
Date of first online publication:02 March 2016
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar