Balogh, M. L. and McGee, S. L. and Mok, A. and Muzzin, A. and van der Burg, R. F. J. and Bower, R. G. and Finoguenov, A. and Hoekstra, H. and Lidman, C. and Mulchaey, J. S. and Noble, A. and Parker, L. C. and Tanaka, M. and Wilman, D. J. and Webb, T. and Wilson, G. and Yee, H. K. C. (2016) 'Evidence for a change in the dominant satellite galaxy quenching mechanism at z = 1.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 456 (4). pp. 4364-4376.
We present an analysis of galaxies in groups and clusters at 0.8 < z < 1.2, from the GCLASS and GEEC2 spectroscopic surveys. We compute a ‘conversion fraction’ fconvert that represents the fraction of galaxies that were prematurely quenched by their environment. For massive galaxies, Mstar > 1010.3 M⊙, we find fconvert ∼ 0.4 in the groups and ∼0.6 in the clusters, similar to comparable measurements at z = 0. This means the time between first accretion into a more massive halo and final star formation quenching is tp ∼ 2 Gyr. This is substantially longer than the estimated time required for a galaxy's star formation rate to become zero once it starts to decline, suggesting there is a long delay time during which little differential evolution occurs. In contrast with local observations we find evidence that this delay time-scale may depend on stellar mass, with tp approaching tHubble for Mstar ∼ 109.5 M⊙. The result suggests that the delay time must not only be much shorter than it is today, but may also depend on stellar mass in a way that is not consistent with a simple evolution in proportion to the dynamical time. Instead, we find the data are well-matched by a model in which the decline in star formation is due to ‘overconsumption’, the exhaustion of a gas reservoir through star formation and expulsion via modest outflows in the absence of cosmological accretion. Dynamical gas removal processes, which are likely dominant in quenching newly accreted satellites today, may play only a secondary role at z = 1.
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (1402Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2949|
|Publisher statement:||This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.|
|Date accepted:||17 December 2015|
|Date deposited:||07 April 2016|
|Date of first online publication:||15 January 2016|
|Date first made open access:||07 April 2016|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|