We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

The competition between confinement and ram pressure and its implications for galaxies in groups and clusters.

Bahé, Yannick M. and McCarthy, Ian G. and Crain, Robert A. and Theuns, Tom (2012) 'The competition between confinement and ram pressure and its implications for galaxies in groups and clusters.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 424 (2). pp. 1179-1186.


Ram pressure stripping of the hot gas that surrounds normal galaxies as they fall into groups and clusters (also referred to as ‘strangulation’ or ‘starvation’) is generally thought to shut down star formation on a time-scale of a few Gyr. However, it has recently been suggested, on the basis of X-ray–optical scaling relations of galaxies in the field and the group/cluster environment, that confinement pressure by the intracluster medium can actually lead to an increase in the mass of hot gas surrounding these galaxies. We investigate the competition between pressure confinement and ram pressure stripping for satellite galaxies in orbit about galaxy groups and clusters using simple analytic models and detailed cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. It is found that, independent of host mass, ram pressure is generally dominant over confinement pressure – only ∼16 per cent of galaxies find themselves in the reverse situation. Furthermore, these galaxies have, on average, less hot gas than ram-pressure-dominated ones, contrary to simple expectations. This is explained by the fact that the small number of galaxies which are confinement dominated are typically at first or second apocentre and have therefore already been maximally affected by ram pressure stripping around first pericentre. Our results are shown to be insensitive to host halo mass; we argue that the same is true for uncertain subgrid processes, such as feedback.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Date accepted:01 May 2012
Date deposited:22 April 2016
Date of first online publication:August 2012
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar