O'Donoghue, Aoife (2014) 'Good offices : grasping the place of law in conflict.', Legal studies., 34 (3). pp. 469-496.
In the pantheon of approaches open to participants in the pacific settlement of disputes, good offices holds a noteworthy place. The evolution of good offices over the past century is concurrent with a trend of considerable transformation within international law, including – amongst other changes – a move away from a state-led legal order, including in good offices following the emergence of the heads of international organisations as its prime users, and a process of legalisation and specialisation within the subject that has entirely altered its character. These changes have led to a redefinition of good offices that stresses the actor carrying out the role above the form that it takes. To accompany these changes in practice, there is a need for a transformation in the legal analysis and definition of good offices. One potential option in achieving this end is Bell's lex pacificatoria. If good offices is to continue to play a significant role in the settlement of violent conflicts, a fully developed legal analysis is necessary to grasp both its historical development and its potential future role.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (417Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12029|
|Publisher statement:||This is the accepted version of the following article: O'Donoghue, A. (2014), Good offices: grasping the place of law in conflict. Legal Studies, 34(3): 469-496, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12029. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||29 April 2016|
|Date of first online publication:||02 January 2018|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|