Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.

Puts, David A. and Hill, Alexander K. and Bailey, Drew H. and Walker, Robert S. and Randall, Drew and Wheatley, John R. and Welling, Lisa L. M. and Dawood, Khytam and Cárdenas, Rodrigo and Burris, Robert P. and Jablonski, Nina G. and Shriver, Mark D. and Weiss, Daniel and Lameira, Adriano R. and Apicella, Coren L. and Owren, Michael J. and Barelli, Claudia and Glenn, Mary E. and Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel (2016) 'Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.', Proceedings of the Royal Society series B : biological sciences., 283 (1829). p. 20152830.

Abstract

In many primates, including humans, the vocalizations of males and females differ dramatically, with male vocalizations and vocal anatomy often seeming to exaggerate apparent body size. These traits may be favoured by sexual selection because low-frequency male vocalizations intimidate rivals and/or attract females, but this hypothesis has not been systematically tested across primates, nor is it clear why competitors and potential mates should attend to vocalization frequencies. Here we show across anthropoids that sexual dimorphism in fundamental frequency (F0) increased during evolutionary transitions towards polygyny, and decreased during transitions towards monogamy. Surprisingly, humans exhibit greater F0 sexual dimorphism than any other ape. We also show that low-F0 vocalizations predict perceptions of men's dominance and attractiveness, and predict hormone profiles (low cortisol and high testosterone) related to immune function. These results suggest that low male F0 signals condition to competitors and mates, and evolved in male anthropoids in response to the intensity of mating competition.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(775Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2830
Date accepted:05 April 2016
Date deposited:13 June 2016
Date of first online publication:27 April 2016
Date first made open access:13 June 2016

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar