We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Diet and locomotion, but not body size, differentiate mammal communities in worldwide tropical ecosystems.

Lintulaakso, K. and Kovarovic, K. (2016) 'Diet and locomotion, but not body size, differentiate mammal communities in worldwide tropical ecosystems.', Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology., 454 . pp. 20-29.


Aim To test whether tropical habitat groups across the world can be differentiated by using taxon-free mammalian community structures and to discuss the implications of this analysis for palaeoecological community studies. Materials and methods We used mammalian community data for 169 localities, which were assigned a priori to hierarchical Olson (1983) vegetation categories. Species over 500 g were classified into dietary, locomotion, and body mass groups and the resulting group structures were analysed using community structure analyses (NPMANOVA, CAP, SIMPER). Results The test results show that the mammalian community structures are significantly different between all of Olson's categories. These differences are highest at Olson's major and minor ecosystem levels, and require the least number of variable categories. At the vegetation level, the number of variable categories required to distinguish between them becomes higher. Of the dietary groups, the number of frugivore–granivores, frugivore–omnivores, grazers and mixed feeders contribute most to these differences, while the number of arboreal, arboreal–terrestrial and subterranean–terrestrial species are the key locomotor groups. Body mass was not a good discriminator. Main conclusions As general ecosystem categories are broken down into more precisely defined habitats, it requires more detailed knowledge of the species adaptations to distinguish between them. Many of Olson's vegetation groups represent a continuum of cover that are, at least at the worldwide comparison, too detailed to differentiate when broad generalities are sought. We suggest using three worldwide tropical major ecosystems in mammalian community structure analyses: “Humid, closed forests”, “Seasonal or interrupted forests and grasslands”, and “Seasonal, open drylands”. Our results also demonstrate that community structures defined by both dietary and locomotor adaptations are powerful discriminators of tropical ecosystems and habitats across the continents we examined, but body mass should be interpreted with caution when the research question pertains to multiple continents.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:© 2016 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Date accepted:05 April 2016
Date deposited:02 June 2016
Date of first online publication:13 April 2016
Date first made open access:13 April 2017

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar