Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Preserving the legacy of historic metal-mining industries in the light of the Water Framework Directive and future environmental change in mainland Britain : challenges for the heritage community.

Howard, A.J. and Kincey, M. and Carey, C. (2015) 'Preserving the legacy of historic metal-mining industries in the light of the Water Framework Directive and future environmental change in mainland Britain : challenges for the heritage community.', The historic environment : policy & practice., 6 (1). pp. 3-15.

Abstract

Contemporary global metal mining is a source of environmental pollution, but in Britain it is our historic mining industry that has left a legacy of contamination in the landscape, around both the immediate mine sites as well as within the river valley floors that drain these orefields. It has been estimated that the levels of lead and zinc stored within some northern British river systems represent values comparable to present-day reserves of economically viable ore deposits and exposure to them can be detrimental to human health. Despite the prevalence and significance of these deposits, they have been neglected by the cultural heritage community in favour of more easily interpretable remains such as mine buildings, technologies of ore procurement and processing, and the final products of manufacture. This paper argues that in light of future climate change and legislation associated with the European Union Water Framework Directive, heritage managers and industrial archaeologists have to start investigating these deposits as part of their studies and to engage with the environmental science and geomorphological communities who are, at present, setting the agenda in terms of strategies for pollution mitigation and landscape remediation.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(391Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1756750514Z.00000000061
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice on 13/04/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1179/1756750514Z.00000000061.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:03 June 2016
Date of first online publication:13 April 2015
Date first made open access:13 October 2016

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar