Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation

Chaves-Montero, J.; Angulo, R.E.; Schaye, J.; Schaller, M.; Crain, R.A.; Furlong, M.; Theuns, T.

Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation Thumbnail


Authors

J. Chaves-Montero

R.E. Angulo

J. Schaye

M. Schaller

R.A. Crain

M. Furlong



Abstract

Subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) is a widely used method to connect galaxies with dark matter structures in numerical simulations. SHAM predictions agree remarkably well with observations, yet they still lack strong theoretical support. We examine the performance, implementation, and assumptions of SHAM using the ‘Evolution and Assembly of Galaxies and their Environment’ (EAGLE) project simulations. We find that Vrelax, the highest value of the circular velocity attained by a subhalo while it satisfies a relaxation criterion, is the subhalo property that correlates most strongly with galaxy stellar mass (Mstar). Using this parameter in SHAM, we retrieve the real-space clustering of EAGLE to within our statistical uncertainties on scales greater than 2 Mpc for galaxies with 8.77 < log 10(Mstar[M⊙]) < 10.77. Conversely, clustering is overestimated by 30 per cent on scales below 2 Mpc for galaxies with 8.77 < log 10(Mstar[M⊙]) < 9.77 because SHAM slightly overpredicts the fraction of satellites in massive haloes compared to EAGLE. The agreement is even better in redshift space, where the clustering is recovered to within our statistical uncertainties for all masses and separations. Additionally, we analyse the dependence of galaxy clustering on properties other than halo mass, i.e. the assembly bias. We demonstrate assembly bias alters the clustering in EAGLE by 20  per cent and Vrelax captures its effect to within 15  per cent. We trace small differences in the clustering to the failure of SHAM as typically implemented, i.e. the Mstar assigned to a subhalo does not depend on (i) its host halo mass, (ii) whether it is a central or a satellite. In EAGLE, we find that these assumptions are not completely satisfied.

Citation

Chaves-Montero, J., Angulo, R., Schaye, J., Schaller, M., Crain, R., Furlong, M., & Theuns, T. (2016). Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460(3), 3100-3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1225

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 19, 2016
Online Publication Date May 23, 2016
Publication Date Aug 11, 2016
Deposit Date Aug 18, 2016
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Print ISSN 0035-8711
Electronic ISSN 1365-2966
Publisher Royal Astronomical Society
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 460
Issue 3
Pages 3100-3118
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1225

Files

Published Journal Article (1.4 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations