Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Changes in higher heating value and ash content of seaweed during ensiling.

Redden, Hilary and Milledge, John J. and Greenwell, H. Christopher and Dyer, Philip W. and Harvey, Patricia J. (2017) 'Changes in higher heating value and ash content of seaweed during ensiling.', Journal of applied phycology., 29 (2). pp. 1037-1046.

Abstract

A problem in the use of macroalgae for biofuel is that harvesting of seaweed is generally seasonal, and there is a need to preserve and store seaweed to supply year-round production processes. Ensiling is a widely used preservation method in agriculture, but there is little research on ensiling seaweed. The changes in ash content, higher heating value (HHV) and dry matter (DM%) of algal biomass together with mass loss (ML) during ensilage for a year was studied for two species of seaweed, Laminaria digitata (LD) and Palmaria palmata (PP), with and without the addition of Lactobacillus plantarum. The mean ash content of the two species was significantly different (LD 24.3 % and PP 18.0 %) and remained constant after 90 days ensiling. The mean HHV before ensiling for PP was higher, 14.2 kJ g−1, compared to LD, 11.9 kJ g−1. Both the species (P < 0.05) and ensilage period (P < 0.05) had a significant effect on HHV. The overall DM% of the ensiled LD (22.4 %) and PP (22.0 %) were similar with a gradual increase in the DM% after 90 days ensiled. There was no effect of the ensiling with or without L. plantarum on DM%. There was a continuous wet matter loss during ensilage, and although the HHV of the ensiled wet biomass increased as the macroalgae became drier over time, the energy available from each kilogramme of wet macroalgae ensiled declined over the year to 78 % in LD and 59 % in PP.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(434Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0975-4
Publisher statement:The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0975-4.
Date accepted:13 September 2016
Date deposited:13 October 2016
Date of first online publication:15 October 2016
Date first made open access:15 October 2017

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar