We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

A new weighted rank correlation.

Maturi, T.A. and Abdelfattah, E.H. (2008) 'A new weighted rank correlation.', Journal of mathematics and statistics., 4 (4). pp. 226-230.


Problem Statement: There have been many cases in real life where two independent sources have ranked n objects, with the interest focused on agreement in the top rankings. Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau coefficients assigned equal weights to all rankings. As a result, the literature proposed several weighted correlation coefficients with emphasis on the top rankings, including the top-down, weighted Kendall's Tau and Blest's correlation coefficient. Approach: This article introduced a new weighted rank correlation coefficient that was sensitive to agreement in the top rankings. It presented the limiting distribution under the null hypothesis of independence and provided a summary of quantiles of the exact null distribution for n = 3(1)9. Results: The article summarized the power comparison between the new weighted coefficient and other weighted coefficients, and showed that the new weighted rank correlation coefficient provided the locally most powerful rank test. Conclusions/Recommendations: The new weighted correlation should be used along with other weighted coefficients when the interest focused on agreement in the top rankings, in order to make an effective inference.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:© 2008 Tahani A. Maturi and Ezz H. Abdelfattah. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:07 November 2016
Date of first online publication:01 April 2008
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar