Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry in children : sensitivity, reliability, and fixation stability in healthy observers.

Jones, P.R. and Yasoubi, N. and Nardini, M. and Rubin, G.S. (2016) 'Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry in children : sensitivity, reliability, and fixation stability in healthy observers.', Investigative ophthalmology & visual science., 57 (14). pp. 6349-6359.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimetry (MP) in children. Also to establish representative outcome measures (differential light sensitivity, fixation stability, test–retest reliability) for children without visual impairment. Methods: Thirty-three adults and 33 children (9–12 years) were asked to perform three monocular MAIA examinations within a single session (dominant eye only). Results: Children exhibited poorer test–retest reliability than adults for measures of both mean sensitivity (95% coefficient of repeatability [CoR95] = 2.7 vs. 2.3 dB, P = 0.036) and pointwise sensitivity (CoR95 = 6.2 vs. 5.7 dB, P < 0.001). Mean sensitivity was lower in children (27.6 vs. 29.5 dB, P < 0.001), and fixation stability was poorer (95% bivariate contour ellipse area [BCEA95] = 4.58 vs. 1.14, P < 0.001). Mean sensitivity was negatively correlated with fixation stability (r = −0.44, P < 0.001). Both children and adults exhibited substantial practice effects, with mean sensitivity improving by 0.5 dB (adults) and 0.9 dB (children) between examinations 1 and 2 (P ≤ 0.017). There were no significant differences between examinations 2 and 3 (P ≥ 0.374). Conclusions: Microperimetry is feasible in 9- to 12-year-old children. However, systematically lower sensitivities mean that the classification boundary for “healthy” performance should be lowered in children, pending development of techniques to improve attentiveness/fixation that may reduce or remove this difference. High measurement variability suggests that the results of multiple tests should be averaged when possible. Learning effects are a potential confound, and it is recommended that the results of the first examination be discarded.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF
(2016Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(1907Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20037
Publisher statement:This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Date accepted:09 September 2016
Date deposited:23 November 2016
Date of first online publication:29 November 2016
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar