Choudhury, Tufyal (2017) 'The radicalisation of citizenship deprivation.', Critical social policy., 37 (2). pp. 225-244.
This article addresses the regulation of citizenship in the UK, in particular the recent increased powers of citizenship deprivation against individuals suspected of involvement in terrorism. It examines the genealogy of such a practice and explains the juridical context of its use. It argues that changes in citizenship policies, broadening state power and removing substantive and procedural safeguards, have eroded equal citizenship by creating a hierarchy among British citizens. This radical policy shift has been enacted in the context of counter radicalisation policies that posit commitment to British values as a key weapon in the ‘war on terror’. Muslims are at best ‘Tolerated Citizens’, required to demonstrate their commitment to British values. Muslims holding unacceptable extremist views are ‘Failed Citizens’ while the ‘home-grown’ radicalised terrorist suspect is conceived of as the barbaric Other to British values, whose failure as a citizen is severe enough to justify the deprivation of citizenship.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (617Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316684507|
|Publisher statement:||Choudhury, Tufyal (2017) 'The radicalisation of citizenship deprivation.', Critical social policy., 37 (2). pp. 225-244. Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.|
|Date accepted:||15 November 2016|
|Date deposited:||25 January 2017|
|Date of first online publication:||09 January 2017|
|Date first made open access:||25 January 2017|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|