Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Bayesian treed calibration : an application to carbon capture with AX sorbent.

Konomi, B. and Karagiannis, G. and Lai, C. and Lin, G. (2017) 'Bayesian treed calibration : an application to carbon capture with AX sorbent.', Journal of the American Statistical Association., 112 (517). pp. 37-53.

Abstract

In cases where field (or experimental) measurements are not available, computer models can model real physical or engineering systems to reproduce their outcomes. They are usually calibrated in light of experimental data to create a better representation of the real system. Statistical methods, based on Gaussian processes, for calibration and prediction have been especially important when the computer models are expensive and experimental data limited. In this paper, we develop the Bayesian treed calibration (BTC) as an extension of standard Gaussian process calibration methods to deal with non-stationarity computer models and/or their discrepancy from the field (or experimental) data. Our proposed method partitions both the calibration and observable input space, based on a binary tree partitioning, into subregions where existing model calibration methods can be applied to connect a computer model with the real system. The estimation of the parameters in the proposed model is carried out using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) computational techniques. Different strategies have been applied to improve mixing. We illustrate our method in two artificial examples and a real application that concerns the capture of carbon dioxide with AX amine based sorbents. The source code and the examples analyzed in this paper are available as part of the supplementary materials.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF
(3034Kb)
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF (Revised version)
(1605Kb)
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF (Revised version)
(1451Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1190279
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of the American Statistical Association on 03/05/2017, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01621459.2016.1190279
Date accepted:15 April 2016
Date deposited:31 January 2017
Date of first online publication:03 May 2017
Date first made open access:03 May 2018

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar