We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

An analysis of school-based contextual indicators for possible use in widening participation.

Gorard, S. and Siddiqui, N. and Boliver, V. (2017) 'An analysis of school-based contextual indicators for possible use in widening participation.', Working Paper. School of Education and School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University, Durham.


This paper looks at the National Pupil Database for England in terms of variables that could be used by universities to help them assess undergraduate applications. Where a young person is obviously disadvantaged, this can be taken into account in contextualised admissions. Of the indicators available, which give the most accurate assessment of that context – singly or in combination? This paper looks at missing data, and what is known about students for whom data is missing. It looks at changes in indicators of potential disadvantage over time. And it looks at the relationship between all indicators. and student attainment and progress at school. The safest and clearest indicators are the sex (male) and age in year (summer born) of a student but neither of these is currently considered in widening participation. Otherwise, the best general indicator is eligibility for free school meals (poverty), and this is best computed as the number of years a student has been known to be eligible. Having a special educational need is also a promising indicator, but doubts are raised about its validity and it anyway covers a wide range of factors, some of which are already dealt with by the education system. Very few students registered as living in care continue in education post-16, and this indicator could be used safely and to advantage. The rest, including area measures, school type, performance relative to school, ethnicity and first language are generally not safe to use.

Item Type:Monograph (Working Paper)
Additional Information:Education Working Paper Series, Working Paper 2
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:UNSPECIFIED
Publisher statement:©School of Education, Durham University
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:13 February 2017
Date of first online publication:February 2017
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar