Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

SEDeblend : a new method for deblending spectral energy distributions in confused imaging.

MacKenzie, Todd P. and Scott, Douglas and Swinbank, Mark (2016) 'SEDeblend : a new method for deblending spectral energy distributions in confused imaging.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 463 (1). pp. 10-23.

Abstract

For high-redshift submillimetre or millimetre sources detected with single-dish telescopes, interferometric follow-up has shown that many are multiple submillimetre galaxies blended together. Confusion-limited Herschel observations of such targets are also available, and these sample the peak of their spectral energy distribution (SED) in the far-infrared. Many methods for analysing these data have been adopted, but most follow the traditional approach of extracting fluxes before model SEDs are fit, which has the potential to erase important information on degeneracies among fitting parameters and glosses over the intricacies of confusion noise. Here, we adapt the forward-modelling method that we originally developed to disentangle a high-redshift strongly lensed galaxy group, in order to tackle this general problem in a more statistically rigorous way, by combining source deblending and SED fitting into the same procedure. We call this method ‘SEDeblend’. As an application, we derive constraints on far-infrared luminosities and dust temperatures for sources within the ALMA follow-up of the LABOCA Extended Chandra Deep Field South Submillimetre Survey. We find an average dust temperature for an 870-μm-selected sample of (33.9 ± 2.4) K for the full survey. When selection effects of the sample are considered, we find no evidence that the average dust temperature evolves with redshift for sources with redshifts greater than about 1.5, when compared to those with redshifts between 0.1 and 1.5.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(5344Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1890
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ©: 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Date accepted:28 July 2016
Date deposited:09 March 2017
Date of first online publication:01 August 2016
Date first made open access:09 March 2017

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar