We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Efficient algorithms for checking avoiding sure loss.

Nakharutai, Nawapon and Troffaes, Matthias C. M. and Caiado, Camila C. C. S. (2017) 'Efficient algorithms for checking avoiding sure loss.', in Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability : Theories and Applications, 10-14 July 2017, Lugano (Switzerland). , pp. 241-252. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. (62).


There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.


Sets of desirable gambles provide a general representation of uncertainty which can handle partial information in a more robust way than precise probabilities. Here we study the effectiveness of linear programming algorithms for determining whether or not a given set of desirable gambles avoids sure loss (i.e. is consistent). We also suggest improvements to these algorithms specifically for checking avoiding sure loss. By exploiting the structure of the problem, (i) we slightly reduce its dimension, (ii) we propose an extra stopping criterion based on its degenerate structure, and (iii) we show that one can directly calculate feasible starting points in various cases, therefore reducing the effort required in the presolve phase of some of these algorithms. To assess our results, we compare the impact of these improvements on the simplex method and two interior point methods (affine scaling and primal-dual) on randomly generated sets of desirable gambles that either avoid or do not avoid sure loss. We find that the simplex method is outperformed by the primal-dual and affine scaling methods, except for very small problems. We also find that using our starting feasible point and extra stopping criterion considerably improves the performance of the primal-dual and affine scaling methods.

Item Type:Book chapter
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:17 April 2017
Date deposited:15 May 2017
Date of first online publication:20 June 2017
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar

Available Versions of this Item