Brooks, Thom (2017) 'Punitive restoration and restorative justice.', Criminal justice ethics., 36 (2). pp. 122-140.
Criminal justice policy faces the twin challenges of improving our crime reduction efforts while increasing public confidence. These challenges are exacerbated by the fact that at least some measures popular with the public are counterproductive to greater crime reduction. How to achieve greater crime reduction without sacrificing public confidence? While restorative justice approaches offer a promising alternative to traditional sentencing with the potential to achieve these goals, they suffer from several serious obstacles, not least their relatively limited applicability, flexibility, and public support. Punitive restoration is a new and distinctive idea about restorative justice modeled on an important principle of stakeholding, which states that those who have a stake in penal outcomes should have a say about them. Punitive restoration is restorative insofar as it aims to achieve the restoration of rights infringed or threatened by criminal offences. Punitive restoration is punitive insofar as the available options for this agreement are more punitive than found in most restorative justice approaches, such as the option of some form of hard treatment. Punitive restoration sheds new light on how we may meet the twin challenges of improving our efforts to reduce reoffending without sacrificing public confidence, demonstrating how restorative practices can be embedded deeper within the criminal justice system.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (233Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2017.1358930|
|Publisher statement:||This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Criminal Justice Ethics on 13 October 2017 available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0731129X.2017.1358930|
|Date accepted:||30 June 2017|
|Date deposited:||05 June 2017|
|Date of first online publication:||13 October 2017|
|Date first made open access:||13 April 2019|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|