Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”?

Schütze, Robert

Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”? Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Re-examines the theory of judicial majoritarianism advanced by Miguel Maduro in respect of the EU internal market, which saw the ECJ as a quasi-legislature which judicially harmonised national rules according to the interests of all Member States. Reflects on the descriptive limitations of Maduro's concept, the normative problems it creates, and the difficulties of its practical test for revealing suspect national rules.

Citation

Schütze, R. (2018). Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”?. European law review, 43(2), 269-280

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 11, 2017
Online Publication Date Apr 9, 2018
Publication Date Aug 9, 2018
Deposit Date Jun 13, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2024
Journal European Law Review
Print ISSN 0307-5400
Publisher Sweet and Maxwell
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 43
Issue 2
Pages 269-280
Publisher URL http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/catalogue/productdetails.aspx?recordid=427&productid=6968

Files

Accepted Journal Article (320 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European law review following peer review. The definitive published version Schütze, Robert (2018). Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”? European Law Review 43(2): 269-280 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations