Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Building a community of practice for transforming 'mothering' of abused women into a ‘mutual care project’ : a new focus on partnership and mutuality.

Kong, S.T. and Hooper, C.-A. (2018) 'Building a community of practice for transforming 'mothering' of abused women into a ‘mutual care project’ : a new focus on partnership and mutuality.', British journal of social work., 48 (3). pp. 633-655.

Abstract

The current child-protection and women-protection frameworks tend to polarise the well-being of women and children. Abused mothers are often considered ‘inadequate’ or ‘incompetent’ if their children fail to achieve socially desirable outcomes. Conversely, children are seen as a burden on abused women in cases where women are ambivalent with respect to their mothering experience. Yet abused women need extra care and support to be competent again in the post-separation context, while children can serve a protective role for their abused mothers. This study employs Cooperative Grounded Inquiry (CGI) for working with abused Chinese women in Hong Kong and their teenage children in order to nurture a community of practice for transforming mothering into a mutual care project. Through partnering with teenage participants for setting care goals and care plans, abused women became aware of how they had monopolised the care work at home while teenage participants recognised how they could contribute to designing and accomplishing care plans. The findings shed light on the cultural fit of ‘community of practice’ in Chinese familial societies, and demonstrate the potential of ‘doing family’ for expanding post-separation protection for abused women and their children. In this article, ‘community of practice’ is proposed as an approach for helping to narrow the gap between child-protection and women-protection systems.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(567Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx055
Publisher statement:This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in British journal of social work following peer review. The version of record will be available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx055
Date accepted:23 March 2017
Date deposited:16 June 2017
Date of first online publication:08 August 2017
Date first made open access:08 August 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar