Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Revisiting the extremely fast disc wind in a gravitationally lensed quasar APM 08279+5255.

Hagino, K. and Done, C. and Odaka, H. and Watanabe, S. and Takahashi, T. (2017) 'Revisiting the extremely fast disc wind in a gravitationally lensed quasar APM 08279+5255.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 468 (2). pp. 1442-1452.

Abstract

The gravitationally lensed quasar APM 08279+5255 has the fastest claimed wind from any active galactic nucleus, with velocities of 0.6–0.7c, requiring magnetic acceleration as special relativistic effects limit all radiatively driven winds to v < 0.3–0.5c. However, this extreme velocity derives from interpreting both the narrow and broad absorption features in the X-ray spectrum as iron absorption lines. The classic ultrafast outflow source PDS 456 also shows similar absorption systems, but here the higher energy, broader feature is generally interpreted as an absorption edge. We reanalyse all the spectra from APM 08279+5255 using a full 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer disc wind model for the ionized wind at 0.1–0.2c, together with complex absorption from lower ionization material, and find that this is a better description of the data. Thus, there is no strong requirement for outflow velocities beyond 0.2c, which can be powered by radiation driving. We show that UV line driving is especially likely given the spectral energy distribution of this source which is intrinsically UV bright and X-ray weak. While the peak of this emission is unobservable, it must be luminous enough to power the observed hot dust, favouring at least moderate black hole spin.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(1559Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx559
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2017. The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Date accepted:02 March 2017
Date deposited:26 July 2017
Date of first online publication:07 March 2017
Date first made open access:26 July 2017

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar