Harrison, G.W. and Lau, M. and Ross, D. and Swarthout, J.T. (2017) 'Small stakes risk aversion in the laboratory : a reconsideration.', Economics letters., 160 . pp. 24-28.
Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible levels of risk aversion over large stakes under certain assumptions. One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a “sufficiently large” range of wealth. Although this assumption is viewed as self-evident from the vast experimental literature showing risk aversion over laboratory stakes, it actually requires that lab wealth be varied for a given subject as one evaluates the risk attitudes of the subject. We consider evidence from a simple design that tests this assumption, and find that the assumption is strikingly rejected for a large sample of subjects from a population of college students. We conclude that the implausible predictions that flow from these assumptions do not apply to one specialized population widely used to study economic behavior in laboratory experiments.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF (231Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.003|
|Publisher statement:||© 2017 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|
|Date accepted:||04 August 2017|
|Date deposited:||31 July 2017|
|Date of first online publication:||19 August 2017|
|Date first made open access:||19 February 2019|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|