Johnson, Elizabeth R. (2016) 'Reconsidering mimesis : freedom and acquiescence in the Anthropocene.', South Atlantic quarterly., 115 (2). pp. 267-289.
In 1993 Michael Taussig's Mimesis and Alterity revitalized the power of the mimetic faculty to craft a vision of nature that was neither the alienated subject of modern science nor the passively malleable medium of late twentieth-century social constructivism. Taussig drew explicitly on a tradition of earlier twentieth-century scholarship—Walter Benjamin, Roger Caillois, and Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno—that located in the mimetic faculty a way out of a techno-fetishized social milieu. This essay explores how mimesis has once again been endowed with revolutionary potential in the contemporary moment through the growing field of biomimicry. I show how mimesis promises a way toward a future free from human hubris and ecological catastrophe—and a way out of the conditions that have created the Anthropocene. I explore how this works in biomimetics, with a detailed look at one of the most celebrated examples of the biomimetic paradigm: the gecko's foot. But, I ultimately suggest that what has been so seductive about mimesis throughout history is that it offers a “way out” of political confrontation. In doing so, I argue mimesis too easily serves as a double mirror—rather than transform production, nonhuman life at the level of biology becomes a force for production.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (620Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3488409|
|Publisher statement:||© 2016 by Duke University Press|
|Date accepted:||16 November 2015|
|Date deposited:||10 October 2017|
|Date of first online publication:||15 April 2016|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|