We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Is Palaeolithic cave art consistent with costly signalling theory? Lascaux as a test case.

Gittins, Rhiannon and Pettitt, Paul (2017) 'Is Palaeolithic cave art consistent with costly signalling theory? Lascaux as a test case.', World archaeology., 49 (4). pp. 466-490.


Several proponents of costly signalling theory (CST) have noted its potential for understanding prehistoric art. We use the Late Upper Palaeolithic art of Lascaux Cave (Dordogne, France) as a test case as to whether we may be able to identify an assertive, individual style in Palaeolithic art. The cave’s abundant images represent one of the most stunning examples of European Upper Palaeolithic cave art and, in terms of the material provisioning of the cave, demonstrable artistic skill, and difficulties accessing decorated areas, it represented a huge cost to its hunter-gatherer creators. But does it represent group cost or can any CST element be identified? We approach this question using several characteristics we regard as central to costly signalling, and explore the various ways by which this occurred within the cave. We conclude that it is best viewed as a group signal, and that no CST component can be identified.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in World archaeology on 20 October 2017 available online:
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:26 October 2017
Date of first online publication:20 October 2017
Date first made open access:20 April 2019

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar