We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast : from performance to aftermath.

Rowley-Conwy, P. (2018) 'Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast : from performance to aftermath.', World archaeology., 50 (2). pp. 221-241.


Ethnographic descriptions of feasts reveal that consumption of meat is usually prominent. Zooarchaeological evidence may thus provide the best way of seeing feasts in the archaeological record. The accumulation of trophy arrays and ongoing high-status activities are confusing behaviours that may be misconstrued as archaeological evidence of feasts. A four-fold classification of zooarchaeological evidence for feasts is put forward: ‘over the top’ (high status); ‘ritually charged garbage’ (often religious); ‘small but special’ (nevertheless sometimes visible); and ‘was this feasting?’ (sometimes equivocal). This typology may allow archaeologists to distinguish between the ethnographic categories of competitive feasts and solidarity feasts.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF (Revised version)
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in World Archaeology on 12 March 2018 available online:
Date accepted:16 February 2018
Date deposited:19 February 2018
Date of first online publication:12 March 2018
Date first made open access:12 September 2019

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar