Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Economical crowdsourcing for camera trap image classification.

Hsing, P.-Y. and Bradley, S.P. and Kent, V.T. and Hill, R.A. and Smith, G.C. and Whittingham, M.J. and Cokill, J. and Crawley, D. and MammalWeb Volunteers, and Stephens, P.A. (2018) 'Economical crowdsourcing for camera trap image classification.', Remote sensing in ecology and conservation., 4 (4). pp. 361-374.

Abstract

Camera trapping is widely used to monitor mammalian wildlife but creates large image datasets that must be classified. In response, there is a trend towards crowdsourcing image classification. For high‐profile studies of charismatic faunas, many classifications can be obtained per image, enabling consensus assessments of the image contents. For more local‐scale or less charismatic communities, however, demand may outstrip the supply of crowdsourced classifications. Here, we consider MammalWeb, a local‐scale project in North East England, which involves citizen scientists in both the capture and classification of sequences of camera trap images. We show that, for our global pool of image sequences, the probability of correct classification exceeds 99% with about nine concordant crowdsourced classifications per sequence. However, there is high variation among species. For highly recognizable species, species‐specific consensus algorithms could be even more efficient; for difficult to spot or easily confused taxa, expert classifications might be preferable. We show that two types of incorrect classifications – misidentification of species and overlooking the presence of animals – have different impacts on the confidence of consensus classifications, depending on the true species pictured. Our results have implications for data capture and classification in increasingly numerous, local‐scale citizen science projects. The species‐specific nature of our findings suggests that the performance of crowdsourcing projects is likely to be highly sensitive to the local fauna and context. The generality of consensus algorithms will, thus, be an important consideration for ecologists interested in harnessing the power of the crowd to assist with camera trapping studies.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download PDF
(1124Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download PDF (Advance online version)
(840Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download PDF
(843Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.84
Publisher statement:© 2018 The Authors.Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservationpublished by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Date accepted:13 April 2018
Date deposited:19 April 2018
Date of first online publication:04 July 2018
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar