Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Between invisibility and over-visibility : self-perception and user expectations of liaison interpreters in business settings.

Zheng, Binghan and Xiang, Xia (2018) 'Between invisibility and over-visibility : self-perception and user expectations of liaison interpreters in business settings.', Babel., 64 (1). pp. 1-32.

Abstract

Recent research on liaison interpreting shows that the interpreters’ role in communicative events includes language facilitator and intercultural mediator. Being empowered with more coordinating functions rather than regarded as invisible conduits, however, how do interpreters with different professional experiences perceive their own role in business settings? And what are the actual expectations on them from their clients? This paper tries to answer the questions through a questionnaire-based survey of three groups of respondents: professional interpreters, student interpreters and clients, with each group including 30 respondents. Chesterman’s (2001) four models of ethics, together with the hypothetical no ethics model, were designed as answers to the questionnaire (17 closed questions) and translation versions to two interpreting samples. The frequencies of responses to the questions and the evaluation scores of the translation versions are collected and analyzed, revealing the following findings: All three groups acknowledge the constraints translation ethics place on the freedom of action; and all three groups agree that interpreters simultaneously shoulder the tasks of translating and coordinating, with the “ethics of communication” being the most widely acknowledged one. However, there are discrepancies between and within the groups, and even attitudinal inconsistencies and contradictions in individual participants. These findings, by re-describing the interpreter’s power in interlingual and intercultural interactions, will help improve professional standards and interpreting training.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(920Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00023.zhe
Publisher statement:This article is s under copyright and that the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.
Date accepted:28 May 2018
Date deposited:10 May 2018
Date of first online publication:09 July 2018
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar