Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Resolution of the apparent discrepancy between the number of massive subhaloes in Abell 2744 and ΛCDM.

Mao, T.-X. and Wang, J. and Frenk, C. S. and Gao, L. and Li, R. and Wang, Q. and Cao, X. and Li, M. (2018) 'Resolution of the apparent discrepancy between the number of massive subhaloes in Abell 2744 and ΛCDM.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society : letters., 478 (1). L34-L38.

Abstract

Schwinn et al. (2017) have recently compared the abundance and distribution of massive substructures identified in a gravitational lensing analysis of Abell 2744 by Jauzac et al. (2016) and N-body simulation and found no cluster in ΛCDM simulation that is similar to Abell 2744. Schwinn et al. (2017) identified the measured projected aperture masses with the actual masses associated with subhaloes in the MXXL N-body simulation. We have used the high resolution Phoenix cluster simulations to show that such an identification is incorrect: the aperture mass is dominated by mass in the body of the cluster that happens to be projected along the line-of-sight to the subhalo. This enhancement varies from factors of a few to factors of more than 100, particularly for subhaloes projected near the centre of the cluster. We calculate aperture masses for subhaloes in our simulation and compare them to the measurements for Abell 2744. We find that the data for Abell 2744 are in excellent agreement with the matched predictions from ΛCDM. We provide further predictions for aperture mass functions of subhaloes in idealized surveys with varying mass detection thresholds.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(625Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(1062Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/sly069
Publisher statement:This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters ©: 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Date accepted:17 April 2018
Date deposited:16 May 2018
Date of first online publication:24 April 2018
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar