Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Acceptability and preferences for hypothetical rectal microbicides among a community sample of young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand : a discrete choice experiment.

Newman, P.A. and Cameron, S. and Roungprakhon, S. and Tepjan, S. and Scarpa, R. (2015) 'Acceptability and preferences for hypothetical rectal microbicides among a community sample of young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand : a discrete choice experiment.', AIDS and behaviour., 20 (11). pp. 2588-2601.

Abstract

Rectal microbicides (RMs) may offer substantial benefits in expanding HIV prevention options for key populations. From April to August 2013, we conducted Tablet-Assisted Survey Interviewing, including a discrete choice experiment, with participants recruited from gay entertainment venues and community-based organizations in Chiang Mai and Pattaya, Thailand. Among 408 participants, 74.5 % were young men who have sex with men, 25.5 % transgender women, with mean age = 24.3 years. One-third (35.5 %) had ≤9th grade education; 63.4 % engaged in sex work. Overall, 83.4 % reported they would definitely use a RM, with more than 2-fold higher odds of choice of a RM with 99 versus 50 % efficacy, and significantly higher odds of choosing gel versus suppository, intermittent versus daily dosing, and prescription versus over-the-counter. Sex workers were significantly more likely to use a RM immediately upon availability, with greater tolerance for moderate efficacy and daily dosing. Engaging key populations in assessing RM preferences may support biomedical research and evidence-informed interventions to optimize the effectiveness of RMs in HIV prevention.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(371Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1258-9
Publisher statement:The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1258-9
Date accepted:22 December 2015
Date deposited:04 July 2018
Date of first online publication:22 December 2015
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar