Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

A cultural perspective on gender inequity in STEM : the Japanese context.

Yoshikawa, Katsuhiko and Kokubo, Akiko and Wu, Chia-Huei (2018) 'A cultural perspective on gender inequity in STEM : the Japanese context.', Industrial and organizational psychology., 11 (02). pp. 301-309.

Abstract

To understand gender inequality in STEM, Miner et al. (2018) illustrate how an individual lens and a social-structural lens provide complementary perspectives. They indicate that gender inequality in STEM should not be simply understood from an individual lens concerning individual choices and responsibilities but also a social-structural lens concerning societal structures, processes, and meanings associated with gender. In this commentary, we would like to bring a cultural perspective to the consideration of the STEM field. Specifically, we focus on gender inequity in STEM in Japan and elaborate how Japanese culture, which emphasizes masculinity, collectivism, and a tight culture, imposes a stronger social-structural influence on gender inequality in STEM and at the same time strengthens the use of the individual lens to explain the phenomena, making the issue of gender inequality more prominent.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(500Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.19
Publisher statement:This article has been published in a revised form in Industrial and Organizational Psychology https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.19. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018.
Date accepted:16 June 2018
Date deposited:16 July 2018
Date of first online publication:19 June 2018
Date first made open access:16 July 2018

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar