Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

On the association between perceived overqualification and adaptive behavior.

Wu, Chia-Huei and Tian, Amy Wei and Luksyte, Aleksandra and Spitzmueller, Christiane (2017) 'On the association between perceived overqualification and adaptive behavior.', Personnel review., 46 (2). pp. 339-354.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer an autonomous motivation perspective to explore the relationship between perceived overqualification and adaptive work behavior and examine job autonomy as a factor that may moderate the association. Design/methodology/approach The hypotheses were tested in two culturally, demographically, and functionally diverse samples: sample 1 was based on North American community college employees (n=215); sample 2 was based on full-time workers, employed in a Chinese state-owned enterprise specializing in shipping (n=148). Findings In study 1, perceived overqualification was negatively related to self-rated adaptive behavior. A follow-up study 2 extended these findings by demonstrating that perceived overqualification was negatively related to supervisor-rated adaptive work behavior when job autonomy was low, rather than high. Research limitations/implications The results of this research offer an autonomous motivation perspective to explain why perceived overqualification relates to adaptive behavior and suggests a job design approach to encourage adaptive behaviors of people who feel overqualified – a sizable segment of the current workforce. Originality/value This is one of the first studies to explore adaptive behavior of workers who feel overqualified – an outcome that has not been examined in this domain. The findings further point out what can be done to encourage adaptive behaviors among overqualified employees.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(475Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2015-0134
Publisher statement:This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (http://dro.dur.ac.uk/25561). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Date accepted:02 April 2016
Date deposited:16 July 2018
Date of first online publication:28 February 2017
Date first made open access:16 July 2018

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar