Maehle, Andreas-Holger (2020) 'Beyond professional self-interest : medical ethics and the disciplinary function of the General Medical Council of the United Kingdom, 1858-1914.', Social history of medicine., 33 (1). pp. 41-56.
Traditional historiography tends to draw a negative picture of British doctors’ ethics during the long nineteenth century. The medical professional ethics of this period have been described as self-serving and as a tool to monopolise the health care market. In this paper I attempt to challenge this rather one-sided view by looking into evidence for the practice of medical ethics, not just its normative texts. Focusing on the disciplinary function of the General Medical Council and discussing a variety of its cases, from fraudulent registration, sexual misconduct and breach of confidence to negligence, covering unqualified assistants and advertising, I argue that nineteenth-century medical ethics aimed at supporting the interests of patients and of the public at large as well as the reputation of the profession.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (333Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hky072|
|Publisher statement:||This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Social History Of Medicine following peer review. The version of record Maehle, Andreas-Holger (2020). Beyond Professional Self-Interest: Medical Ethics and the Disciplinary Function of the General Medical Council of the United Kingdom, 1858-1914. Social History of Medicine 33(1): 41-56is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hky072|
|Date accepted:||19 July 2018|
|Date deposited:||20 July 2018|
|Date of first online publication:||17 August 2018|
|Date first made open access:||17 August 2020|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|