Faraci, David (2014) 'A hard look at moral perception.', Philosophical studies., 172 (8). pp. 2055-2072.
This paper concerns what I take to be the primary epistemological motivation for defending moral perception. Offering a plausible account of how we gain moral knowledge is one of the central challenges of metaethics. It seems moral perception might help us meet this challenge. The possibility that we know about the instantiation of moral properties in something like the way we know that there is a bus passing in front of us raises the alluring prospect of subsuming moral epistemology under the (relatively) comfortable umbrella of perceptual or, more broadly, empirical knowledge. The good news on this front is that various combinations of metaethical positions and theories of perception arguably have the potential to vindicate moral perception (though I won’t do much to defend this claim here). The bad news, I’ll argue, is that moral perception would be dependent for its epistemic merit on background knowledge of bridge principles linking moral and non-moral properties. Thus, in order to defend a purely perceptual moral epistemology, one would have to argue that knowledge of those principles is likewise perceptual. I further argue it is not.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (306Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0397-6|
|Publisher statement:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Philosophical studies. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0397-6|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||04 September 2018|
|Date of first online publication:||11 October 2014|
|Date first made open access:||04 September 2018|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|