Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect

Abrams, D.; Palmer, S.B.; Rutland, A.; Cameron, L.; Van de Vyver, J.

Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect Thumbnail


Authors

D. Abrams

S.B. Palmer

A. Rutland

L. Cameron



Abstract

Research with adults has demonstrated a “black sheep effect” (BSE) whereby, relative to evaluations of normative group members, ingroup deviants are derogated more than outgroup deviants. The developmental subjective group dynamics (DSGD) model holds that the BSE should develop during middle childhood when children apply wider social norms. Three hundred and thirty-eight children who were between 5 and 12 years old judged a normative (socially desirable) and a deviant (socially undesirable) member from an ingroup or an outgroup school. Results confirmed a developmental increase in the BSE, the first time this has been demonstrated. Children’s own evaluations of group members were mediated by their expectations about ingroup peers’ evaluations. In line with DSGD and social domain theories, with age, children’s explanations of peer evaluations for ingroup deviance focused relatively more on loyalty. Practical and theoretical implications for peer inclusion and exclusion are discussed.

Citation

Abrams, D., Palmer, S., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Van de Vyver, J. (2014). Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032461

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Jan 1, 2014
Publication Date Jan 1, 2014
Deposit Date Sep 6, 2018
Publicly Available Date Sep 7, 2018
Journal Developmental Psychology
Print ISSN 0012-1649
Electronic ISSN 1939-0599
Publisher American Psychological Association
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 50
Issue 1
Pages 258-270
DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032461
Related Public URLs http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/23162/

Files

Accepted Journal Article (509 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© 2014 American Psychological Association, all rights reserved. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations