Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Nonparametric predictive inference for diagnostic test thresholds.

Coolen-Maturi, T. and Coolen, F.P.A. and Alabdulhadi, M. (2020) 'Nonparametric predictive inference for diagnostic test thresholds.', Communications in statistics : theory and methods., 49 (3). 697-725 .

Abstract

Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic tests is crucial in many application areas including medicine, machine learning and credit scoring. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and surface are useful tools to assess the ability of diagnostic tests to discriminate between ordered classes or groups. To define these diagnostic tests, selecting the optimal thresholds that maximize the accuracy of these tests is required. One procedure that is commonly used to find the optimal thresholds is by maximizing what is known as Youden’s index. This article presents nonparametric predictive inference (NPI) for selecting the optimal thresholds of a diagnostic test. NPI is a frequentist statistical method that is explicitly aimed at using few modeling assumptions, enabled through the use of lower and upper probabilities to quantify uncertainty. Based on multiple future observations, the NPI approach is presented for selecting the optimal thresholds for two-group and three-group scenarios. In addition, a pairwise approach has also been presented for the three-group scenario. The article ends with an example to illustrate the proposed methods and a simulation study of the predictive performance of the proposed methods along with some classical methods such as Youden index. The NPI-based methods show some interesting results that overcome some of the issues concerning the predictive performance of Youden’s index.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(368Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1549249
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in statistics - theory and methods on 28 December 2018 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1549249
Date accepted:08 October 2018
Date deposited:09 October 2018
Date of first online publication:28 December 2018
Date first made open access:28 December 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar