Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Same-day versus consecutive-day precision error of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for interpreting body composition change in resistance trained athletes.

Zemski, Adam and Hind, Karen and Keating, Shelley and Broad, Elizabeth and Marsh, Damian and Slater, Gary (2019) 'Same-day versus consecutive-day precision error of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for interpreting body composition change in resistance trained athletes.', Journal of clinical densitometry., 22 (1). pp. 104-114.

Abstract

Introduction: The application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in sport science settings is gaining popularity due to its ability to assess body composition. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommends application of the least significant change (LSC) to interpret meaningful and true change. This is calculated from same-day consecutive scans, thus accounting for technical error. However, this approach doesn't capture biological variation which is pertinent when interpreting longitudinal measurements, and could be captured from consecutive-day scans. The aims of this study were to investigate the impact short-term biological variation has on LSC measures, and establish if there is a difference in precision based on gender in a resistance trained population. Methodology: Twenty-one resistance trained athletes (age 30.6 ± 8.2 years; stature 174.2 ± 7.2cm; mass 74.3 ± 11.6kg) with at least 12 months consistent resistance training experience, underwent two consecutive DXA scans on one day of testing, and a third scan the day before or after. ISCD recommended techniques were used to calculate same-day and consecutive-day precision error and LSC values. Results: There was high association between whole body (R2=0.98–1.00) and regional measures (R2=0.95–0.99) for same-day (R2=0.98–1.00) and consecutive-day (R2=0.95–0.98) measurements. The consecutive-day precision error, in comparison to same-day precision error, was significantly different (p<0.05), and almost twice as large for FM (1261g vs 660g), and over three times as large for LM (2083g vs 617g), yet still remained within the ISCD minimum acceptable limits for DXA precision error. No whole body differences in precision error were observed based on gender. Conclusion: When tracking changes in body composition, the use of precision error and LSC values calculated from consecutive-day analysis is advocated, given this takes into account both technical error and biological variation, thus providing a more accurate indication of true and meaningful change.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(576Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.005
Publisher statement:© 2018 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Date accepted:23 October 2018
Date deposited:01 November 2018
Date of first online publication:29 October 2018
Date first made open access:29 October 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar