Schammo, P. (2018) 'Caught in a cross-fire? the US CFTC and the European Commission's proposals on third-country CCPs.', Company lawyer., 39 (9). pp. 277-278.
Reviews proposed European Commission amendments to the rules in Regulation 648/2012 concerning central counterparties (CCPs) providing services in the EU. Considers the implications for the UK in its post-Brexit role as a third country, the oversight role of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the impact of the reforms in the US, and why the Federal Trade Commission finds them unacceptable.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (216Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=30791409&recordid=458|
|Publisher statement:||This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Company Lawyer. The definitive published version Schammo, P. (2018). Caught in a cross-fire? The US CFTC and the European Commission’s proposals on third-country CCPs. The Company lawyer 39(9): 277-278 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||02 November 2018|
|Date of first online publication:||27 July 2018|
|Date first made open access:||27 July 2019|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|