We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Reevaluation of the porosity measurements under different confining pressures : a better appraisal of reservoir porosity

Pan, L. and Jones, S.J. and Wang, X. and Guan, W. and Li, L. (2019) 'Reevaluation of the porosity measurements under different confining pressures : a better appraisal of reservoir porosity.', AAPG bulletin., 103 (3). pp. 515-526.


Porosity is one of the most important rock properties in describing hydrocarbon reservoirs. Tests on core samples provide direct and representative porosity data and the measurement of porosity at high confining pressures is recognized to correlate well with subsurface reservoir porosity. Whereas theoretical deductions of the changes and relationships of pressures, volumes, and compressibility suggest that porosity is reduced during the coring and lifting processes, the porosity measurement at elevated confining pressure does not evaluate original reservoir porosity. This theory is quantitatively validated by repeated laboratory experiments of loading and unloading on sandstone core samples. When the in-situ confining pressure is approximately 30-35 MPa (4350-5076 psi), coring and lifting would cause a porosity reduction of approximately 1.2%~1.6%, and the porosity test under high confining stress results in further porosity loss. A revised approach in calculating reservoir porosity from cored samples is proposed and can have significant implications for reserve calculations, recovery factors, and geostatistical reservoir models. The study is important for both conventional and unconventional reservoirs as it discusses a fundamental mechanism of porosity change.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Date accepted:20 September 2018
Date deposited:13 November 2018
Date of first online publication:20 September 2018
Date first made open access:20 September 2019

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar