Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The map is not the territory : a sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn.

Bridge, G. (2018) 'The map is not the territory : a sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn.', Energy research and social science., 36 . pp. 11-20.

Abstract

Energy research in the social sciences has embarked on a ‘spatial adventure’ (Castán Broto and Baker, 2017). Those setting out on this journey have started from different disciplinary and theoretical locations, yet a “map” of sorts has begun to emerge. Made up of epistemological positions, conceptual vantage points and lines of enquiry, this map demarcates and structures the growing field of energy geography providing a more-or-less agreed guide to the territory. In the paper's first half I reflect on the scope and significance of the spatial turn in energy research. I describe the map now guiding much spatial research on energy, identifying core ideas around which spatially-sensitive social science energy research has come to cohere, notwithstanding its heterogeneity and internal diversity. I offer a supportive reading. In the second half, I offer a more critical reading of the adventure so far, arguing that it is unnecessarily limited in its reading of space. The full potential of a spatial perspective for social science research on energy has yet to be realised. I outline three pathways for realising some of this potential – geographies of knowledge production, differentiation and disassembly – and show how each takes energy research's spatial adventure in new directions.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download PDF
(251Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.033
Publisher statement:© 2017 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Date accepted:22 September 2017
Date deposited:11 December 2018
Date of first online publication:16 October 2017
Date first made open access:11 December 2018

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar