Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The relation between mathematics students' discipline-based epistemological beliefs and their summative assessment preferences.

Simpson, A. (2019) 'The relation between mathematics students' discipline-based epistemological beliefs and their summative assessment preferences.', International journal of research in undergraduate mathematics education., 5 (2). pp. 147-162.

Abstract

Existing research posits a relationship between undergraduate mathematics students’ mathematics-related epistemological beliefs and their perceptions of summative assessment. This paper reports a study investigating whether there is indeed such a relationship. First and second year mathematics undergraduate students at two universities in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire, comprising the Assessment Preference Inventory and the Mathematics-Related Beliefs Questionnaire. The results did not support the prediction, with the only statistically significant relation found being one between students’ self-efficacy and their preference for summative assessment methods requiring complex responses. We conclude either that the prediction of the relationship is mistaken, or that concerns about the definition of discipline-based epistemological beliefs, the uniformity of the sample in the study or the issue of validity of the tools used to measure epistemological beliefs may mask the nature of this relationship.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(204Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00086-5
Publisher statement:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in International journal of research in undergraduate mathematics education. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00086-5
Date accepted:23 January 2019
Date deposited:24 January 2019
Date of first online publication:20 February 2019
Date first made open access:20 February 2020

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar