Finlay, Christopher J. (2019) 'Justification and legitimacy at war : on the sources of moral guidance for soldiers.', Ethics., 129 (4). pp. 576-602.
Attempts to simplify ethics in war by claiming exclusive legitimate authority for the law of armed conflict underestimate the moral complexities facing soldiers. Soldiers risk wrongdoing if they refuse moral guidance that can independently evaluate their legal permissions. State soldiers need to know when to object to a legal duty to fight; nonstate fighters need to know when to disregard legal prohibitions against fighting. And both might sometimes best discharge their moral duties by following a bespoke rule departing from noncombatant immunity in a principled way that has been designed for a particular conflict by an authoritative leadership.
|Full text:||Publisher-imposed embargo |
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF (825Kb)
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (1327Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1086/702973|
|Publisher statement:||© 2019 by The University of Chicago.|
|Date accepted:||10 January 2019|
|Date deposited:||12 February 2019|
|Date of first online publication:||31 July 2019|
|Date first made open access:||31 July 2020|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|