Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The enactment of the counter-terrorism 'Prevent duty' in British schools and colleges : beyond reluctant accommodation or straightforward policy acceptance.

Busher, Joel and Choudhury, Tufyal and Thomas, Paul (2019) 'The enactment of the counter-terrorism 'Prevent duty' in British schools and colleges : beyond reluctant accommodation or straightforward policy acceptance.', Critical studies on terrorism., 12 (3). 440-462 .

Abstract

When Britain imposed the “Prevent duty”, a legal duty on education, health and social welfare organisations to report concerns about individuals identified as at-risk of radicalisation, critics argued it would accentuate the stigmatisation of Muslim communities, “chill” free speech, and exacerbate societal securitisation. Based on 70 interviews with educational professionals and a national online survey (n = 225), this article examines their perceptions of how the duty has played out in practice. It then provides an explanation for why, contrary to expectations, not only has overt professional opposition been limited, but there has been some evidence of positive acceptance. It is argued that these findings neither simply reflect reluctant policy accommodation nor do they simply reflect straightforward policy acceptance, but rather they comprise the outcome of multi-level processes of policy narration, enactment and adaptation. Three processes are identified as being of particular importance in shaping education professionals’ engagement with the duty: the construction of radicalisation as a significant societal, institutional and personal risk; the construction of continuity between the Prevent duty and existing professional practices; and the responsibilisation of first-line professionals. The conclusion reflects on the wider public and policy implications of these findings.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(686Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1568853
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical studies on terrorism on 30 January 2019 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17539153.2019.1568853
Date accepted:09 January 2019
Date deposited:15 February 2019
Date of first online publication:30 January 2019
Date first made open access:30 July 2020

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar